Most of what lands in the mailbag is about the content notes, the editions, and how far a single reviewer can honestly go. Here are the ones that come up again and again.
A short paragraph before the review proper. It names what a reader might reasonably want to know in advance: violence, grief, illness, colonial language, or a scene that tends to unsettle people. It is not a rating and not a warning label, and it does not tell you whether to read the book.
Yes, in one respect. Alongside the usual content note, the review says which edition and translator were read, and whether the translator's choices shift the tone of a passage. A scene can read as blunt in one English version and restrained in another, and that difference matters.
No. Memoir gets the same care as fiction. A real illness or a real death is not automatically easier to read because it happened, and the note stays factual and brief either way.
Write in. No single reader can predict every limit, and a missed note is useful information. Reader mail about it shapes how later entries are written, and sometimes the review itself is amended.
It gets said plainly in the review rather than tucked into a footnote. If the discomfort is central to the form, hiding it would misrepresent the book. The note tells you what is there; the review argues about what it is doing.
Still unsure about something the notes do not cover? The longer questions page goes further into method, and you can always send a title for a closer look.